Can Google Search Operate Without Giving Credit To Backlinks?

February 25, 2014 · 15 comments

in SEO

a three-sided dice with S. E. O. wrote on itAre Backlinks  
Really Dead?

Recently, a reader asked Matt Cutts, head of Google’s webspam (and thus SEO) team: 

Does the big G have a version of the search engine that totally excludes any backlink relevancy? I’m wondering what search would look like and am curious to try it out.

I think this is a fantastic question because it addresses whether or not backlinks are totally and completely dead. This is something that gets speculated about a lot. 

If you’re not sure what a backlink is or why it’s important, I suggest you start here

Here’s what Matt has to say: 

So, it sounds like that at least SOME backlinks are still being credited… though the list of which ones are not is now pretty extensive. 

There’s not a lot of cut and dry answers with backlinks any more either since Google has also shown that they will sometimes treat nofollow links as dofollow links “at their discretion”. 

In the meantime, this means that we need to continue to pay attention to creating amazing content that others WANT to link to so that we gain the highest quality – editorial – type backlinks possible from well established trusted domains. 

Do you have questions about backlinks? 

~ Kim ~
Simple Tech Tips For Marketing 

Get The Inside Scoop!
social tripletKeep up with all the latest social marketing changes!


13 comments
giang
giang

Hello, Kim.

I have read your article and see the video of matt you provide, it is really nice and helpful. Video of matt I have seen the important points from the backlink.

Willena Flewelling
Willena Flewelling

I guess, as has been said, this is another way for Google to encourage original content that offers real value to our readers. Having others choose to backlink to us means a lot of work on our part, but it pays off far better in the long run, because those backlinks come from people who come back to our blogs again and again because they like what we offer, and want to return.

Sagar
Sagar

Nice post

I think back links have not loosen its importance . Well it is a fact that back links from low quality sites will probably effect the web page and the back links from high quality and good PR will always be advantageous. Well the important point what everybody miss is the quality content or information on the site so that people will like it and possibility that we can get back links from high quality sites.

Thank you for sharing

Chery Schmidt
Chery Schmidt

Hi Kim, You asked if we have questions about back links? Well I for one have many LOL I guess we just need to concentrate on giving more value HUH? I have been noticing that a lot of people have been using more video.s and their articles are not as long as they used to be, Now I would think this would have a negative impact, Am I wrong to assume this? Thanks for the great video! Chery :))

Marty Diamond
Marty Diamond

Having content rise in importance and spammy backlinks decline is wonderful news ....but it does create some issues for smaller businesses who now find themselves completing with much larger firms for ranking - firms have big budgets for online marketing and who have whole departments devoted to content creation.

Means we all have to think more strategically about our audience and niche. A worthy challenge!

Julieanne van Zyl
Julieanne van Zyl

I think it's like Kim says - Google is looking out for those websites who's content shows it is authoritative within that niche. From what Matt says, it sounds like certain backlinks still help to bring up the search results with the best quality.

Sue Bride
Sue Bride

This is another example of how people who abuse the system have affected SEO for those who don't just like keyword stuffing and false keywords made meta keywords less useful.

However it should mean that quality content is easier to find and easier to rank.

Glenn David
Glenn David

Hii Kim, I think the title should be, Google search without paid backlinks. Bcoz these are the links which Google don't want but they still dominates the web. Getting links manually is best but require hard work.

Mainak Halder
Mainak Halder

The question is really nice Kim and really one to think of. But have a question. Many spammers just tend to place backlinks at any site and does Google rank them even for short-term?

Michael Aulia
Michael Aulia

That's too bad, because I know lots of sites pay to get monthly backlinks, which is the "noise" Matt is talking about. It's sort of unfair for smaller sites with original content who don't have many backlinks like the bigger sites have

Maybe Google should (if not already) gives a much higher, higher "point" if the backlink comes from a big brand. At least no one can abuse the system

Sue Bride
Sue Bride

Hi Chery, YouTube is considered an authoritative site so their embedded videos tend to rank well despite the shorter posts that usually go alongside them. I am sure it does not hurt that Google own YouTube either. Because Google has little else to go on, keywords (in title, description,tags) and backlinks attached to videos are more powerful than for normal posts so more traditional optimization techniques work well with them.

Kim Castleberry
Kim Castleberry

Michael, that's a great point. I would say that Google is already working hard to identify which domains are "brand authorities" who never out-link carelessly and who carry a ton of credibility with their followers... and awarding a lot more "points" to anything these brands/domains point to. I can't prove that but everything suggests that that is true already. It's also why Google has wanted authorship and such in place so they can better track that type of authority and have more insight into who is vs who isn't. The best thing we can do at the moment is become a brand authority... and probably the second best thing we can do is to get SEEN and mentioned by brand authorities... whether it be from their blog (a backlink) or from their public social profiles (passing of influence and recognition in Google's eyes).

Kim

Chery Schmidt
Chery Schmidt

Thanks Sue, This does make sense, I do appreciate your help.. Chery :))